Space Science Opportunities Augmented by Exploration Telepresence - Part II

July 11 - 13, 2017
California Institute of Technology - Pasadena, CA 91125

Workshop Overview:

The first workshop on Space Science Opportunities Augmented by Exploration Telepresence (October 3-7, 2016) was designed to:

  1. initiate a discussion of the penalties imposed on telerobotic scientific research on planetary surfaces by long communication delays (high latency) and limited information flow (low bandwidth); and
  2. imagine new telerobotic research modalities that feature the use of low-latency, high-bandwidth strategies to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of telerobotic science.

Much of the first workshop explored how planetary field science has been done in the past, what recent advances have been made in low-latency telerobotics in other domains (e.g., surgery), and what kinds of planetary surface science might most benefit from low-latency, high-bandwidth science by telepresence (SBT). SBT may be particularly advantageous for three kinds of planetary field science.

  1. It may be the only way to do the highest-quality field science in environments which are so extreme that presently available technology will not offer suitable protection for on-site astronauts.
  2. It may be necessary to do research on transient events (e.g., cryovolcanic eruptions, or atmospheric phenomena such as dust devils), the timescales of which preclude effective study by high-latency telerobotics.
  3. SBT may permit more effective teleoperation of multiple, geographically distributed robotic assets on a planetary surface, enabling rapid, large-scale reconnaissance which could guide more detailed future research. 

In this second workshop, we will focus on the conceptualization of specific research projects that would address existing knowledge gaps regarding the development of advanced telerobotic assets and science operations protocols specifically for SBT. Building on these concepts, were expect to identify opportunities for SBT investment from NASA and other key governmental and private stakeholders.  Ultimately, our final report will outline the value of SBT and recommend strategies for its use to enhance planetary field science.

Team Leads

The study program schedule is available in .pdf here

  • Dan Adamo — Astrodynamics Consulting
  • Bob Anderson — JPL
  • Stephen A. Bailey — Deep Space Systems
  • Jim Bell — Arizona State University
  • Dallas Bienhoff — Cislunar Space Development Company, LLC
  • John Blitch — U.S. Air Force Academy [WERC/AFRL]
  • Joel Burdick — Caltech
  • Matt Burkhardt — Caltech
  • Terry Fong — NASA Ames Research Center
  • Lou Friedman — The Planetary Society
  • Paul Glick — UCSD/JPL
  • Blake Hannaford — University of Washington
  • Kip Hodges — Arizona State University
  • José Hurtado — University of Texas at El Paso
  • Tom Jones — IHMC
  • Laura Kerber — JPL
  • Joseph Lazio — JPL
  • Daniel (Dan) Lester — Exinetics
  • Neal Lii — DLR
  • Mark Lupisella — NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
  • Cameron Mercer — Arizona State University
  • Daniel Pastor Moreno — Caltech
  • Gregg Podnar — Accommodata Corporation
  • Julie Townsend — JPL