Workshop Overview:
The space-based gravitational-wave observatory LISA will offer unparalleled science returns, including a view of massive black-hole mergers to high redshifts, precision tests of general relativity and black-hole structure, a census of thousands of compact binaries in the Galaxy, and the possibility of detecting stochastic signals from the early Universe.
While the Mock LISA Data Challenges (2006–2011) gave us confidence that LISA will be able to fulfill its scientific potential, we still have a rather incomplete idea of what the end-to-end LISA science analysis should look like. The task at hand is substantial. Our algorithms need to resolve thousands of individual sources of different types and strengths, all of them superimposed in the same multi-year dataset, and simultaneously characterize the underlying noise-like stochastic background. Our catalogs need to represent the complex and highdimensional joint distributions of estimated source parameters for all sources. Our waveform models need to reach part-in-105 accuracy (to achieve full testingGR performance), with sufficient computational efficiency to sample parameter space broadly. Our data reduction needs to ensure the phase coherence of GW measurements across data gaps and instrument glitches over multiple years. It is tempting to assume that current algorithms and prototype codes will scale up to this challenge, thanks to the greatly increased computational power that will become available by LISA’s launch in the early 2030s. In reality, harnessing that power will require very different methods, adapted to future high-performance computational architectures that we can only glimpse now. Thus, we need to begin our exploration at this time, seeking inspiration from other disciplines (e.g., big-data processing, computational biology, the most advanced applications in astroinformatics), and learning to pose the same physical questions in different, future-proof ways—or even daring to imagine questions that will be tractable only with future machines.
The broad objective of this study program is to imagine how evolved or rethought data-analysis algorithms and source-modeling codes will solve the LISA science analysis on the computers of the future. For instance, can we run numericalrelativity simulations on massively parallel, loosely connected processors, in a fault tolerant way? Can we break away from the serial nature of stochastic parameter estimation to (again) exploit parallelism? Can we apply “divide and conquer” principles to the extremely interconnected LISA “global fit”? What representation can we give for the entries (which range from very fuzzy to very defined) in evolving source catalogs, so that we can support the production of partially cleaned datasets, and allow the interaction of multiple analysts? The answers will help guide LISA science and data analysis R&D for the next decade.
Team Leads
-
Saul Teukolsky
California Institute of Technology/Cornell
-
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
The study program schedule is available in .pdf here
- Rachel Akeson — Caltech
- Anne Archibald — Universiteit van Amsterdam
- Stanislav Babak — APC, Université Paris Diderot
- Katelyn Breivik — Northwestern University
- C. Titus Brown — UC Davis
- Alvin Chua — JPL
- Neil Cornish — Montana State University
- Curt Cutler — JPL
- Scott Davidoff — JPL
- Francois Foucart — University of New Hampshire
- Chad Galley — JPL
- Lawrence Kidder — Cornell University
- Prayush Kumar — Cornell University
- Astrid Lamberts — Caltech
- Geoffrey Lovelace — Cal State Fullerton
- Ashish Mahabal — Caltech
- Christine Corbett Moran — Caltech
- Laura Nuttall — Cardiff University
- Maria Okounkova — Caltech
- Travis Robson — Montana State University
- Mark Scheel — Caltech
- Deirdre Shoemaker — Georgia Institute of Technology
- Stephen Taylor — Caltech
- Saul Teukolsky — Caltech
- Massimo Tinto — UC San Diego
- Michele Vallisneri — JPL
- Vijay Varma — Caltech
- Alberto Vecchio — University of Birmingham
Presentations
| Speaker | Affiliation | Presentation |
|---|---|---|
| Stanislav (Stas) Babak | APC, Université Paris Diderot | Introduction to Data Analysis of Gravitational-Wave Signals (34.8 MB .pdf) |
| Curt Cutler | JPL/Caltech | An Overview of Lisa Science (2 MB .pdf) |
| Deirdre Shoemaker | Georgia Tech | Analytical and Numerical Modeling of Binary Sources: State of the Art and Prospects (19 MB .pdf) |
| Rachel Akeson | Caltech | Astronomical Data Archives (819 KB .pdf) |
| C. Titus Brown | UC Davis | Live Data Products (312 KB .pdf) |
| Neil Cornish | Montana State University | Stochastic Methods in LISA Searches (25.9 MB .pdf) |
| Francois Foucart | University of New Hampshire | Matter Simulations in the LISA Era (1.7 MB .pdf) |
| Chad Galley | JPL | Reduced-Order Modeling and Gravitational Waveforms (2.4 MB .pdf) |
| Lawrence E. Kidder | Cornell University | New Paradigms for Computational Astrophysics (379 KB .pdf) |
| Prayush Kumar | Cornell University | Waveform Modeling for LIGO Parameter Estimation: Status & Challenges for LISA (4.9 MB .pdf) |
| Ashish Mahabal | Caltech | Astronomical Applications of Machine Learning and Neural Networks (8.4 MB .pdf) |
| Antoine Petiteau | University Paris-Diderot – CNRS | LISA (Distributed) Data Processing “Center” (13.2 MB .pdf) |
| Michele Vallisneri | JPL | Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (8 MB .pdf) |